Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Five Who Changed The World
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Membership Matters
Doctrine That Dances
True Story: A Christianity Worth Believing In
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
Worship By The Book
Models and theories of corporate worship are currently a hot topic in the evangelical world. Everyone seems to have their own opinion about just exactly what worship should be or do, and it those differing opinions are not limited to different denominations. Often within a denomination (or a church even) there is a wide variation in what is considered appropriate worship. D.A. Carson has given the evangelical world a mighty asset for the subject of worship in his book, Worship by the Book. Here, Carson, along with Mark Ashton, R. Kent Hughes, and Timothy J. Keller explore exactly what the Bible has to say about worship and look at how three different faith traditions interpret biblical worship within their own contexts.
Though the contributing authors each come from a different faith tradition, it is interesting to see that they have much more in common in their understanding of corporate worship than differences. Their commonality is seen in the fact that each is dedicated more to the worship of a Holy God than the satisfaction of their denominational standards. Ashton points out that Thomas Cranmer’s conviction concerning worship was that it should be biblical, accessible, and balanced (70). It is obvious that each of the contributors to this book view worship in the same spirit as Ashton and Cranmer. Worship by the Book shows that worship services must focus primarily on the worship of God, but that worship done correctly will also be edifying and evangelistic.
Summary
A book such as this one is not easily summarized for it does not flow in a definite pattern. Because it is essentially a collection of four essays by four different authors, it is difficult to do either or all justice by examining the book as a collective whole. The first chapter, written by D.A. Carson, is an attempt to construct an abbreviated theology of worship. In this chapter Carson constructs a theology and a definition of worship that is the foundation for the remainder of the book. His definition includes, “Worship is the proper response of all moral, sentient beings to God, ascribing all honor and worth to their Creator-God precisely because he is worthy, delightfully so” (26). Though he expands this thought in detail, it is fair to say that the first chapter is the path toward and explanation of a definition of worship.
The remaining three chapters are written by pastors of various denominations and represent their convictions about worship. In the second chapter, Mark Ashton with C.J. Davis explains the Anglican perspective on worship based upon Thomas Cranmer’s convictions and writings in the Book of Common Prayer. Ashton holds that the Anglican Church found its identity in years past not only in the Bible, but through the Book of Common Prayer that helped ministers to grasp Scripture and to balance the interpretation of Scripture with prayers and edifications for believers. This liturgical guide also ensured that Anglican churches covered the entire canon of Scripture. Ashton laments that the lack of dedication to Cranmer’s book has caused an identity crisis in the Anglican Church (65). This crisis stems from the fact that the church has chosen not to use Scripture as the basis for recent liturgical guides and have therefore lost their focus in worship. True worship that binds the church together, says Ashton according to Cranmer, is biblical, accessible, and balanced (70).
R. Kent Hughes addresses a very different worship perspective in his essay on the worship in the free church. The challenge for the free church is not to maintain its identity with its denomination, but it is still much the same as that of the Anglican church. Worship must still be about God and His word, but in the free church it is essential to encourage worship of God beyond the Sunday morning service. Hughes believes that worshippers must be taught to live lifestyles of worship rather than depending only corporate worship experience (142). Thus he says, “I have come to see that while all of life is worship, gathered worship with the body of Christ is at the heart of a life of worship (142).” The free church, with its lack of liturgy has to work to remain “God-focused” in the light of increasingly human-focused worship services within the evangelical free churches (149). Further he reminds leaders of the free church that corporate worship must be Word-centered if it is to glorify God (159), but as important as being focused on preaching the Word of God is for the listener to focus intently on listening to God’s Word (163).
Timothy J. Keller, coming from a Presbyterian perspective faces yet another set of problems but with much the same solution as the other authors. Worship, he agrees, must focus on God and his Word if it is to be effective and acceptable. Keller, however, grapples with the proper style for a worship service in New York City. To find his balance, Keller turns to the reformation and to John Calvin. Calvin believed in glorifying God in the context of gathered worship but refused to “pit the glory of God against the edification of the participants” (203). Keller believes that worship that truly brings glory to God’s name will by its very nature edify the believers present during the worship event. Worship, says Keller, exists to bring people “face to face with God” (210). He emphasizes that because worship is such an important occurrence it must be done with excellence and practice (211). His points are best summarized in the statement, “Christian worship is both a cause and an effect of our being a very distinct community” (219).
Critical Evaluation
My overall evaluation of Carson’s book is very strong. He has compiled a book on worship that is not only scholarly, but is very comprehensive as it covers worship from three different denominational perspectives. The book’s strongest contribution is the denominational variety from which its contributors make their observations and suggestions. Churches can gain a lot by understanding how other denominations perceive and go about worship of God.
I believe, however, that the book would have had more value had Carson, or some other contributor, made an effort in a final chapter to compare the worship styles and recommendations discussed by Ashton, Hughes, and Keller. The book does a great job explaining what worship is and looks like from three different perspectives, but it does not say what a reader is supposed to do with the information that she receives from this book. The book needs a section that gives suggestions and insight into how to apply the ideas discussed by each of the contributors into the Twenty First Century church.
Beyond a chapter to tie up loose ends, Carson could have done more in the opening chapter to make it more accessible and worthwhile. His definition of worship (26) is far too cumbersome. Further, he suggests in his closing paragraph that it is necessary “to explain that genuine worship is nothing more than loving God with heart and soul and mind and strength and loving our neighbors as ourselves, but also show what a statement like that means in the concrete decisions of life” 63, but he does nothing to tell how this can be done. If Carson is going to suggest discussion and explanation about the true nature of worship, he has a responsibility to his reader to explain what that means.
In the end, the book carries great weight, not because it is a theological treatise, but because it is practical and thorough enough for the scholar yet easy for the average church attendee to understand. Its greatest value is probably not for the seminary classroom, but rather for the local church setting where lay members and ministers alike can benefit by examining their own worship services and styles in light of the worship of others. Worship is easily misconstrued and misunderstood when it is viewed within a vacuum, but Worship by the Book gives its readers the opportunity to experience some of what worship is in other church settings without missing the experience of worship in their home church.
Conclusion
In conclusion, Worship by the Book is a wonderful contribution to the study and lifestyle of worship within the evangelical church. Worship is about more than music; for the believer, a lifestyle of worship is demanded by God. Carson and the other contributors to the book do a great job to show that, at its core, worship is about man’s response to God as God intends it and not about man’s interpretation of what God desires. Corporate worship in the New Testament is a two-fold experience of God’s glory and believer’s edification, and neither can or should be divorced from the other. True worship finds its definition and meaning in God’s Word and within that Word it is apparent that true worship is biblical, balanced, and accessible by all.
Monday, June 16, 2008
Elders in Congregational Life
The recent surge in reformed theology among evangelicals has also led to an increased interest in a plurality of elders as leaders of the church. This relationship may simply be from the fact that many reformed writers have come from a presbyterian background that emphasizes the plural elder model, or from the community emphasis that accompanies reformed teaching. Regardless of the reason for the interest, it remains that the plural elder model is becoming increasingly popular, even in some Baptist churches.
Phil Newton, in Elders in Congregational Life argues that the plural elder model, though not the norm in Baptist life, has always existed in Baptist life. Quoting current and former Baptist leaders such as John Piper,Mark Dever,Benjamin Keach and W.B. Johnson as well as ancient and modern confessions of faith, Newton convincingly shows that plural elders have always been present in a minority among Baptists. Building on that foundation, the author aims to show that the minority opinion was the correct representation of the New Testament church.
Here is precisely the wisdom of the New Testament pattern of plural eldership. No one man possesses all the gifts necessary for leading a congregation...The pastor is first among equals in authoiry --first by virtue of the church's call and his training and gifts, but equal in that he is not a "Lone Ranger" figure in church leadership.
The major weakness of the book is the belief that elders (and only elder leadrship) can safeguard against pride in the ministry in a greater way than deacon-led congregations.
Often the church staff or pastor or deacon chairman receives undue attention by the congregation. That approach to church leadership has long crippled churches. But the goal of elder plurality dismantles crippling power structures, redirection attention to the glory of Christ. Plurality thus humbles the natural pride involved in leadership, and gives a conctant reminder that the church exists for the glory of Christ, not the aggrandizement of one man, or a few men.
Elders are given the authority to rule (just as deacons are in other settings), and the temptations that come with leadership in the church exist regardless of the title given to the office. It is naive, at best, to suggest that a body of elders is immune from the temptations inherent within leadership.
That withstanding, however, this book is a valuable read for anyone interested in the subject of plural elders. Also, this book should serve as a warning to pastors with too much authority. Newton writes, churches that have a pastor as an authority above others have a disproportionately high number of moral failures at the top level of leadership. Whether you agree with Newton's survey of the Scriptures, everyone should be concerned about the lack of accountability that is often present within the church.
Newton gives some great hands on tips to apply the teachings of his book and to institute plural elders in the church. Even if you do not plan to lead toward plural eldership in your church, you should plan to institute accountability for those serving in leadership within the church as a failsafe for the church and her leaders.
Thursday, June 12, 2008
Comeback Churches
Tuesday, June 3, 2008
The Big Idea
Theology of the Reformers
Theology of the Reformers by Timothy George is not a new book, but it is a necessary book, for in it, George does not merely trace the biographical information of the personalities involved in the great reformation, but rather he examines the theology behind each man that led him to react as he did toward the established church. It has often been said that history repeats itself, and if that is true, then George's book is timely as a reminder that the reformation should not merely be a time in history, but should be a continual activity of the church of Christ in this world.
As George himself says:
While we must not forfeit the hard won victories of the reformers in the interest of a facile ecumenism, we celebrate and participate in the quest for Christian unity precisely because we take seriously the Reformation concept of the church-ecclesia semper reformanda, not merely a church once and for all reformed, but rather a church always to be reformed, a church ever in need of further reformation on the basis of the Word of God.
If one thing alone were to distinguish the reformers, it would be the Word of God. It is unfortunate that their major disagreements (some which led to violence), were over minute details and not the necessary tenets of the faith. However, the devotion to Scripture from Luther, Calvin, Zwingli, and Menno Simons is a high standard that we should all strive to meet.
George has written a text that any serious student of the reformation should not be without. Pastors should read Theology of the Reformers, because pastors led the reformation and the church is always in need of evaluation and reformation.
Wednesday, May 28, 2008
Searching For God Knows What
Thursday, May 22, 2008
Preaching and Preachers
SUMMARY OF THE BOOK
Dr. Lloyd-Jones has composed a book that is written specifically to preachers. He makes no apologies for that and makes no effort to address other aspects of the pastoral ministry. His volume is a collection of lectures delivered first to the students of Westminster Theological Seminary. In Preaching and Preachers he covers in great detail nearly every aspect of preaching of which one could conceive. He begins first by establishing the basis for preaching. In his first chapter, aptly entitled “The Primacy of Preaching,” Dr. Lloyd Jones establishes that the primary reason for keeping preaching first is not found in the wisdom of men, but rather in the Word of God. Using examples from the New Testament, he points out that Jesus commands his disciples to be witnesses. He also points to the apostles in the First Century who appointed others to serve tables so that they could give focus to the ministry of the word (p. 23).
Having established the biblical basis for preaching, he then moves to address all things and parties involved in preaching. The things he addresses include the sermon itself, the form of the sermon, and the act of preaching. The act of preaching, he correctly points out, is more than just the delivery of a speech. The act of preaching is the delivery of God’s word through a man. The parties involved in preaching include both the preacher and the congregation. Multiple times in the book, the author says that preaching is actually an interactive experience. It is necessary for the preacher to engage the congregation in the sermon, not merely preach at them.
In the last half of the book, Lloyd-Jones addresses the various activities that are a part of preaching. Preaching is much more than standing before an audience. The author addresses not only the construction and preparation of the sermon, but also the preparation of the preacher as well. Lloyd-Jones says that “The preacher’s first and most important task is to prepare himself, not his sermon” (p. 166). However, preparation of one’s self is not enough to ensure quality preaching. He goes further to speak about the details of a sermon; the introduction, conclusion, and even illustrations and the place of humor in the sermon. In short, the book is a survey on the total act of preaching, from prayer and study to delivery and the time of decision.
STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES
The greatest strength of the book is an obvious one, and that is its author. Dr. D. Martin Lloyd-Jones was an amazing preacher and pastor. A book written about preaching to preachers has its greatest value when coming from a man with the gift of preaching, the acumen to preach well, and years of experience in the pulpit. The experience of this time-tested preacher gives validity to his work that no number of earned degrees could provide. In the preface, the author states that his purpose is to provide help to young preachers, he accomplishes his goal by giving insight through his experience, for experience is the greatest thing that a young pastor lacks.
CONCLUSION
Dr. D. Martin Lloyd-Jones has written a very good book of wisdom for young and old preachers alike. The book was not always enticing, but it is full of insight, wisdom, and enough excitement to keep a reader interested. It is sad to note that the front flap of the book refers to Dr. Lloyd-Jones as “the last of the preachers.” Based on this book, it is very doubtful that he would have been satisfied with that title. In fact, if that is true, then Preaching and Preachers has indeed failed because it has not influenced men to embrace their calling as its author did. I would encourage this book to young preachers as a text to cuddle next to in bed or by a fire with a cup of coffee where they could be lovingly reprimanded and encouraged with the wisdom of an aged pastor who had experienced God’s greatness throughout the course of his lifetime. Dr. Lloyd-Jones serves as a role model for preachers, and this book is a blueprint for living and preaching as Dr. Lloyd-Jones saw fit.
9 Marks of a Healthy Church
Thursday, April 24, 2008
A Comedian's Guide to Theology
Several weeks ago I was introduced to Thor Ramsey at a comedy show I attended with a group from the church. He had his book for sale in the lobby, but I waited and purchased it from Amazon. If you are looking for a light-hearted introduction to theology, Ramsey has written a good book for you. If, however, you are interested in a hard-hitting deep theology, you shouldn't buy a book with the title, A Comedian's Guide To Theology.
In light of what it is, I will give a brief review. Suffice it to say that it was enjoyable, if not very intellectually stimulating, but I did find some quotes worth repeating. His last chapter dealing with death was actually very good, in fact, probably worth the ten bucks I paid for the book.
I was especially intrigued (maybe even convicted) by Ramsey's insight here:
Medieval people feared a quick and sudden death because it would not give them time to be iministered to by the church. Armies even debated whether an ambush was immoral because it didn't give their opponents time to prepare for death. Medieval people wanted a lingering death because this would give them time to reconcile with their enemies...
They didn't fear death.
They feared God.
There is evidence of a man who has a proper understanding of God and of death. If the entire book had the strength of the last chapter, it would get a whole-hearted reccommendation, but because the other chapters show significant weakness, I encourage you to bear in mind the title. If you want a laugh with some theology interspersed, this is a great book for you.
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Judas and The Gospel of Jesus
The Shack
The book cover says that The Shack is "Where tragedy confronts eternity." Indeed, the author does address tragedy and its implications in our world and in eternity as well.
However, the author also refers to God as, A large beaming African American Woman. The Holy Spirit is a small, distinctively Asian woman, and Jesus is, a middle eastern man dressed like a laborer.
We can all agree that his assessment of Jesus is dead on, but the fictional view of God is nothing short of heresy. First, the Ten Commandments specifically point us away from any graven image of God...a person of any sort is a graven image. Secondly, though God has no gender because he is Spirit, God has determined for himself that he would be referred to in the masculine sense. Jesus did not pray, Our Mother... Jesus prayed, Our Father who art in heaven.
I think, however, that this error as well as most of the others in the book can be summed up in the author's words. Reporting a conversation between God the Father (the large African American woman confusingly called Papa and referred to throughout the book with interchangeable pronouns him and her) and Mack, the main character, Papa says this to Mack, That's okay, we'll do things on your terms and time. This concept is foreign to Scripture. God operates on God's terms because he is God. It is we, the creatures, who are called to submit to his terms.
When we make the decision that it is God and not we who submit, then our hermeneutic allows for God to be female because the Bible and God himself is made in our image and not we in his as the Bible plainly shows. I do not reccommend this book, but if you choose to read it, I would love to hear your comments. Apparently some people love it, I was personally disappointed to see the people who reccommend the book on the cover...As orthodox Christians we should always be careful where we give our stamp of approval.
Monday, April 7, 2008
Confessions of a Reformission Rev.
I'm a bit behind the learning curve, but I have just recently developed an interest in the preaching and writing of Mark Driscoll. He is the pastor of the HUGE Mars Hill Church in Seattle, Washington. As a pastor and missionary he embodies everything he writes and preaches about by impacting the culture of one of the least-churched cities in the United States.
In Confessions of a Reformission Rev., which I believe is his second, Driscoll recounts many of the stories of planting and growing a missional church. The principles and lessons that he has learned and shares are applicable not only to a mega-church to postmoderns, but to any church interested in reaching their community for Christ. Mars Hill's commitment to reaching the lost should stir the hearts of every Christian.
On page 32, Dricoll writes, "Without a clear definition of what a missional church community is and does, tragically, community will become the mission of the church." Ultimately, this begs the question of every Christian...Will I be more concerned with the sense of community within my own church or with the mission of my church to reach the community around me? Christ has commanded us to love one another, bue he has also given us a clear directive to go...
I heartily reccommend Driscoll's book as a fire-starter for reformission in your own life and ministry, but it is also a great introduction into the ins and outs of the Emergen Church Movement from which Driscoll has worked to distance himself.